The first head of the Buddhist church was born in 1702, lived for 75 years, leaving, promised to return to his disciples. In 1852, 75 years after Zayaev death, was born Itigelov. He also lived for 75 years. Details can be found by clicking Dr. Neal Barnard or emailing the administrator. And back to us again after 75 years. That is four times the number of repeats 75. When Itigelov took over as Hambo Lama, the parishioners Tsongolskogo datsan, flooded in floods, appealed to him to define a new place to build the temple.

He pointed out the place, saying that there is buried the bell and vajra Zayaev. And there's really found his personal belongings and later built a new datsan. So, for believers it was undisputed reincarnation of first Hambo Lama Zayaev. Several years ago, Lama Zhargal Dugdanov among the thousands of books stored in Devazhin-Duganov Ivolginsk Datsan, discovered previously known manuscript Itigelova. At five pages in the Tibetan language, he tells 12 of his incarnations over several thousand years: five in India, five in Tibet, and two in Buryatia.

Itigelov tells how in a past life Zayaev being, he presents in the form of alternate offerings of gold, silver and coral Dalai Lama, the Panchen Lama and Buddhist deities and receive from them information about their previous lives. "If this book was made even a discrepancy, he would never have achieved eternal body, "said Hambo Lama Damba Pandito Ayushev. Existence is not usually perceived by the senses of human contact and confirmed Itigelova Ganzhur Lama Radnaev, one of the most respected astrologers in Buryatia. All occurred findings related to the name of a great lama, there have been no accident and not only as a result of purposeful work of llamas and staff of the Institute, and in largely due to the manifestation of the phenomenon Itigelova. Recall that in recent years in Ulan-Ude, in Ivolginsk, Horinskom and other regions of the texts were found written by him, the sacred vessels and other objects of worship, allowed sufficient detail to reconstruct his life and the chain of previous incarnations. For example, Buryat lamas maintain that they followed his five Tibetan and five Indian lives, while one of them He received teachings from the Buddha Sakyamuni. They drew near to the solution and other mysteries Itigelova precedent. As it turned out to end their way of life for two years Lama deliberately reduced the weight of his body. As for not physiological, and spiritual aspects of the phenomenon of incorruptibility, it was the result of a direct apprehension of the Void – the great reality of all phenomena. Seven times a year, a large Buddhist holidays, arranged for Itigelova huge queue. Some of worship even feel his touch. Lama speak of many miracles happening around the "Jewel of the body." Including the magic of healing people who were able to see Hambo Lama Itigelova. When Itigelov returned to us, really was a kind of solace Russia – to end the war in Chechnya, local civil wars in large cities for property, stable economic development and increasing importance of Russia in the world. Refute or substantiate the validity of such allegations is useless, the rational mind there totally helpless.

Especially often he remembered his main Teachers, of course, also in order to vividly reflect the fact that this man as his teacher, as the author knows, never to remember Socrates. And if someone finds itself on the assumption that it is familiarity with the legacy of Socrates inspired Shakespeare's solution to the problem of cognition itself, then completely refute this assumption may be turning again for the play "Winter's Tale." And just to once again not to injure the soul Shakespeare as a reminder that in this play do not understand its readers, the author does not point to the appropriate place in the play. Shakespeare, of course, met with the legacy of Socrates. Indeed, in sonnet 59 he just said he was looking for, not yet decided whether someone of "wise men of old," the task before him. And seeing that this problem Socrates, in fact, that not even decided that Shakespeare could not lose to him every kind of interest.

It is not excluded that the heat from the coals, which enclose Socrates devils in hell, added to the heat of shame, that Socrates is experiencing whenever, in the apt words of Solzhenitsyn, "obrazovantsy" commemorate his words: "All I know is that I do not know." Shakespeare is so faux pas does not make it. Learn more on the subject from Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. He simply play "Fruitless efforts of love" wrote: "… we know what we know." And he knew exactly, without knowledge of which no one would be a man, even when, as believed Confucius, he wants to. And then, respectively, in fact, did not know Socrates. "Brevity – the soul of the mind" – wrote William Shakespeare in "Hamlet." But in the annals of "Henry IV he did not mince words, to fully and clearly expressed its understanding that the first and essential prerequisite of the conscious and timely resolution of any problems in this world is complete and accurate understanding of its terms. In the play "Measure for Measure," and not by accident that in this play, he repeated again: "… all the difficulties become easy when they understood." And to understand the condition of the problem – so understand that we know.

Of course, but Socrates can find a great many other contenders for the fact that it applies to them the hint contained in the words of Shakespeare's play "The End – the cause of the crown": It is in vain … no reasonable words scattered, but sow, so adults and give fruit. But the author is willing to burn for ever and hell-hell, if someone will tell him that the issue of how wisely to sow reasonable, good, eternal, at least interested in Socrates. Of course, but Socrates can find a great many other contenders for the fact that it applies to them the reproach of Shakespeare, it made in the play "Fruitless efforts of love", "Ducks of his arguments woven subtle than the foundation of its conclusions." But the author, again, ready to burn in hell, if someone can show him what to Socrates, this reproach does not apply. But the point is that, remembering all this, have unwittingly poison the soul of Shakespeare. Therefore, the author of this note and limited, leaving all the other evidence that Shakespeare during his stay on earth to the spirit of Socrates could not stand at a time when Shakespeare will begin to understand.

So obviously all this stressing portraits Warhol radically at odds with the portrait tradition in which value of the portrait depended on how it seems given to the depicted individual rights. We see it in the bewildered, often hostile reactions of art critics at the portraits of Warhol. Despite the fact that the portraits were some recognition of the artistic community at the exhibition "Portraits of the 70s' at the Museum Whitney, custom portraits remain the same occasion for sarcasm, they are often taken as an example as the most vulgar manifestation 'Corruption' and 'prostitution' of the artist. Like much of Warhol created these portraits became an occasion for discussions on the status of art, the artist and for the substitution of the things people. These are the themes to which Warhol turned more In his early portraits of celebrities and were in fact inherent in his silk-screen technique. Silkscreen Warhol.

This method, based on reproductions of photographs to create the desired 'effect pipeline', not claimed presence of a living artist's model. As noted by Warhol, working with silkscreen, you take a photo, zoom, translate in the glue on the silk, and then fill it with black, so they soaked silk, but do not glue. Thus you get one and the same image, each time slightly different … The first experiments with silk-screen printing was the head of Troy Donahue and Warren Beatty, and when in the same month died of Marilyn Monroe, Warhol have had the thought to do pictures of her beautiful face – the first portraits of Marilyn. Because the initial phase of this picture – it is a correction of photos, not the person – not Warhol portrayed person, he created them. Artwork considered not in terms of relations with 'real person', but in relation with the process of reproduction, and therefore we can say that Warhol worked with the sample, rather than the original.